Reviewed by Susan Bye
© all rights reserved
There is no doubt that The Australian Women's Weekly
holds a special place in the hearts of Australian cultural historians. Established
in 1933, the Weekly's longevity and popularity have given it the status
of a cultural icon in this country. Boasting a consistently high circulation
and an extensive 'pass-on' readership, the magazine has long played an influential
part in the mass culture enterprise, selling a seductive amalgam of commodity
and ideology. Yet, although the Weekly has always proudly participated
in an expanding consumer culture, this has never been the sum of its character
and function. The Weekly has never 'simply' addressed its readers as
consumers, but has been, over the years, more or less successful in inviting
readers to identify as 'ordinary Australian women'. Hence, for historians
working to foreground some of the identifications and representations made
available to women at certain times in the previous century, the Weekly
has held a particular fascination. In Australian Humanities Review, see
also
http://www.australianhumanitiesreview.org/copyright.html
for copyright notice.
![]()
Who Was That Woman?: The
Australian Women's Weekly in the Postwar Years, Susan Sheridan with
Barbara Baird, Kate Borrett and Lyndall Ryan, UNSW Press, 2001
In Who Was That Woman?: The Australian Women's Weekly in
the Postwar Years, Susan Sheridan offers a detailed examination of the
Weekly, concentrating on the twenty-five year period from 1946 to 1971.
Focusing on the period encompassing the peak of the Weekly's popularity,
Sheridan emphasises the importance of the magazine as a cultural site: "It
represented everyday Australia to itself during the years of radical social
change following World War II" (p.1). At the same time, in order to draw
out the implications of the complex and often conflicting discursive representations
circulated by the magazine, Sheridan foregrounds the 'problem' of the magazine's
address, the nature of the female reader constructed by the Weekly.
Central to this study is the exploration of the various and changing ways
that this pivotal cultural text produced the idea of femininity during the
period of transition on which this study focuses.
In order to understand the structure and construction of Who Was That Woman?,
it is necessary to take a look at the major research project out of which
this book emerged. A key component of the larger project, which was designed
and instituted by Sheridan and Lyndall Ryan, was the compilation of an Index
to the much sourced Weekly. The Index which has been produced out of
this project covers the years 1946, 1951, 1956, 1961, 1966 and 1977, underpinning
what Sheridan describes as the 'slice' approach to historical study. By rejecting
a more comprehensive approach to the magazine during this twenty-five year
period, Sheridan argues that she and her research team have been better able
to "identify signs of significant changes at regular intervals (p.8)".
This particular methodological approach organises Sheridan's work, and is
central to her examination of the changes in the Weekly's discourse
of femininity during the period under investigation. Divided into eight chapters
dealing with 'facets' or themes of femininity and domestic culture in the
Weekly, Who Was That Woman? conscientiously adheres to the original
terms of the inquiry. The chapters deal with: the housewife as consumer: sex,
romance and marriage; motherhood; work; house and garden; food and cooking;
health; fashion and beauty. These chapters are, in turn, divided into sub-headings
which further organise Sheridan's careful plotting of the changes which can
or, as the case may be, cannot be identified over each five year period.
One of the drawbacks of this kind of categorising is that each sub-heading
introduces another diachronic sweep through the period being examined and
can, on occasion, seem to fragment the general discussion. At the same time,
for readers wishing to focus on a specific subject or theme, this way of organising
the book could prove helpful. Moreover, Sheridan's project involves the processing
of a considerable quantity and diversity of material: "the complex texture
of a women's magazine: fiction, humour, advice columns, celebrity stories,
informative features, photo stories, editorials, advertising (p.8)."
Constructing a coherent historical narrative out of this kind of material
is necessarily fraught, and it is impressive that Sheridan is so rigorous
in her documentation and analysis of the discursive change which is the object
of her study.
It is interesting that Sheridan chooses to organise the material with which
she is dealing in such a way that she rarely succumbs to the magazine's allure
not only its nostalgic affect, but the semiotic riches which invite
interpretation almost for its own sake. She is rarely tempted to linger, and
the examples she draws from her research into the Weekly work to propel
each discussion segment through the requisite twenty-five years.
In an essay Sheridan wrote during the early stages of the Weekly project,
she pointed to the magazine's nostalgic power as a pitfall for intellectuals
of her ('babyboomer') generation. In fact, Sheridan rigorously eschews nostalgia
and desire. It is interesting, in this context, how few references there are
in the book to the Weekly's fascination with both royalty and celebrity.
Curiously, in her introduction, Sheridan professes to be 'haunted by' other
ways of organising her material, one of which was to examine the Weekly's
celebrity stories: "Do Hollywood, and later, television stars offer any
real competition to the Royal Family? (p.8)."
It could be argued that the essays by Sheridan's associates - Barbara Baird,
Kate Borrett and Lyndall Ryan - which intersect the main analysis, release
some of the possibilities which Sheridan's approach require her to reject.
In particular, in her entertaining essay on the Weekly in the fifties,
Lyndall Ryan chooses to conceive of her own affective relationship with the
Weekly as a tool for analysis, rather than a pitfall to be avoided.
Ryan describes her relationship with the Weekly of the fifties in terms
of recognition and identification. By the end of the decade, however, the
Weekly had no more to offer Ryan and others like her: It was as if
the Weekly had provided my generation of women with the key to the Pandora's
box of modernity but would not let us open it (p.66)."
While Sheridan's study of the Weekly is conceived of in terms of social
revolution, she avoids the personal and political ambivalence which can be
a trap for feminist scholars writing about a text like the Weekly.
Focusing on the Weekly as a key discursive site during a period of
transition, Sheridan's concern is to understand the significance given to
changing ideas (p.8)". Hence, while 1971 may have been located in this
study as the end of the Weekly's era of dominance, Sheridan's interest
is always in the magazine as a vital site of cultural production, never as
a quaint artefact of declining relevance.
Susan Bye is a PhD student at La Trobe University. Her research focuses
on the representation of Australian television in the popular print media
of the fifties.
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()