|
Here is a fine haiku by the Japanese poet Seishi, a
twentieth-century master:
The signal pistol
Echoes on the hard surface
Of the swimming pool.
(Blyth 346)
And this tiny gem is by the contemporary Australian
writer Robert Gray, matching Seishi for precision even though Gray's
poem is fashioned from a much looser part of the world:
Torpid farmland afternoons.
A windmill stirs
as a bubble breaks in buttermilk.
(Gray ‘Twenty Poems' 91)
Entire systems of reality are sketched quickly but
exactly in these works. Shifts of scale spring from quickly conjured
settings. Note all the perspectives offered in each poem, how in an
instant your sensibility grabs several vantages on the scenes.
Conjunctions of heat and smell and sound all shuttle across your
cognitive frame, putting you here and there in a flash, giving you
sudden and intense access to realities within the settings that are
being witnessed. From the intimacy of your own witnessing body, you
span out to encompass sharp details of large places—the hard acoustic
slap in a swimming pool that's big enough for tournaments; the
almost-imperceptible transpiration across flatland paddocks that need
more water than raw nature supplies. And then in the next instant, as
the meagre syllables slip along, memories pulse suddenly within you to
bring you quickly back close to yourself via past time. All this occurs
in a rhythm that folds the larger world and you together unstintingly.
Appreciating Seishi's and Gray's crystalline miniatures, you know
closeness as well as vastness in a retinue of glimmering moments.
Emphasising definitive details of lived experience so exactly, both
poems are realist.
Seishi once explained why utterances as tiny as these
can be so thrilling, so revelatory. In an aside made to acknowledge his
admiration of the French symbolist poets, he quoted Mallarmé
asserting that ‘[because] objects are already in existence, it is not
necessary to create them … all we have to do is grasp the relationships
among them' (Yamaguchi xix). This chimes well with Thomas Hoover's
vivid account of what happens in a successful haiku: ‘the mind is
struck as with a hammer, bringing the senses up short and releasing a
flood of associations' (Hoover 205). In the moment of intensified
perception and interpretation that gets laid out across three concise
lines, messy existence can be rendered as an essence so that the gist
of an experience is offered as a refined set of organised elements and
shaping influences that hold a larger world intensified on a page and
poised to expand again in your mind.
I remember being warned off traditional Japanese
aesthetics in Graduate School, when I was being trained to assay the
political affordances in all cultural processes and products. I recall
being told that statements such Hoover's and traditions such as Zen and
the symbolist credos all peddled a belief in some illusory and
immaterial essence that purports to float freely above the everyday
struggles of citizens labouring in the messier world of material
exigency. I remember being warned that aesthetes such as the old Zen
masters and their modern apologists were haughty Platonists wrapped
about with false consciousness and uninterested in the material work
that politics must engender in the real world, in the objective realm
of pragmatic action.
However, these condemnations missed the fact that
immaterial relationships always insinuate the material
componentry of the world, that combinative influences are coursing
constantly amidst all secular experience, and that such systems combine
to cause reality. True, it is tempting to assert that some patrician or
ideal state beyond politics has been extracted
in these tiny poems, rarefied and diamantine as they appear. But it is
misleading—perhaps it is fair to say it is unreal—to insist
that these reduced impressions of habitable scenes are so refined as to
be ineffable and depoliticised. When Thomas Hoover declared that a
haiku can provide a quick metaphysical jolt that helps a reader discern
some larger connective pattern of valence in the everyday world, he was
not arguing for the aesthetical transcendence of political affairs.
Rather he was describing how the reader can be brought dramatically
close to the often covert connectivity that subtends and really
arranges the world.
Granted, I've spent these opening paragraphs chasing
some esoteric concerns, but by clarifying this notion of the extract
I've found a useful way to start thinking about ‘the
art of the real', particularly as it can be practised in my own
society. Australia is a nation where much has depended on
concealment—think of the landgrabbing, think of the withholding of
payments and wages to Indigenous workers, think of the reluctance to
acknowledge the damage that's been caused by water wastage, carbon
emissions and by imported systems of land-use. In such a society it is
useful to deploy the trope of the extract provocatively because a
well-chosen detail can act as the startling trigger that releases the
flood of associations for anyone who has been primed to perceive what
lies beneath the surface of ordinary experience. An extracted detail
might grant a focused observer access to the systematic understanding
of a larger reality. Next question: how to turn oneself and one's
readers into focused observers?
I can begin to exemplify this extractive method with
brief reference to three projects from my own research. Example 1: for
many years I've been ruminating on the enigmatic notebooks of First
Fleeter William Dawes, who recorded weather conditions and astronomical
patterns as well as a tiny but hugely significant fraction of
Indigenous vocabulary and grammar in the Sydney Cove district between
1788 and 1791. The evidence in the taciturn notebooks is truncated
because Dawes was sent home to England just as he was beginning to
grasp and extract the material components (vocabulary) and the
essential organizing principles (grammar) of the local language. What
we have to work with, therefore, is a set of intensely significant
clues and a world of absences across which we must speculate
imaginatively yet rigorously. In Dawes' notebooks, a flood of
associations can flow, but the reader needs to learn how to strike
hammers on the limited set of keys that have survived the past via the
meager transcriptions. In doing so, the reader is trained to get a
sense of the relationships that held the world together even as it was
beginning to fall apart. The reader is trained to understand the world
of Sydney Cove relationally and always provisionally,
with
a postulative understanding always in process.
Example 2: a few years ago I wrote a book called Seven
Versions
of an Australian Badland. It examines a landscape where
colonial landgrabbing and monocultural farming have plundered the
environment until the place now appears like a defiled and exhausted
thing. Over the past three decades I've crossed this broken country
many times, with a growing conviction that it is a scree of evidence
bearing witness to the unruly historical forces that have shaped it. In
such landscapes—and they're everywhere in Australia—we have to ask,
what can be made of this scene now? Attending to relationships amongst
a constrained array of details that were highlighted through the
selective and combinative procedure of my writing in Seven Versions,
I
nudged the reader into asking questions. For example, what can we
know about the ecologies that have gone feral in Central Queensland?
What of the wrenched geomorphics, the weed-infested gullies and
floodplains, the roofless towns with a dozen residents still hanging
about? How can we overhear the pertinent gossip—the attempts at truth
and the self-serving lies—that buzz about it? What of the
journey-patterns, the shuttling rhythms stitching the country together
in time, now and in the past? What can we make of the documents that
have been generated in response to this country? And what of the
absences blotting the retrieved documentary evidence—when are they
meaningful, when are they nothing? In the book I tried to use all these
scrappy details to help people think about the absences and silences
between all the pinpointed examples that made up the scenarios that I
presented in prose that was deigned to spur rigorous speculation rather
than lock down singular conclusions.
In Example 3—a series of computer-activated works of
video art known collectively as Life After Wartime—viewers
are given textual and musical prompts encouraging them to account for a
salvaged batch of crime-scene photographs that no longer have any
conclusive documents attached.1
As Life After Wartime has grown, project by project, a
cluster of imaginative and analytical responses to the photographs have
aggregated into a database that works as a kind of story-engine
proffering an infinite set of plausible but inherently contentious and
restless speculations concerning the enigmatic scenes in the archive.
Here is one little example from the ‘Life After Wartime' suite, an
excerpt from a 100-page poem called ‘Accident Music':

Everything is worth something—Make rust with blood—
A fact, blunt and material—Fluid on a breadboard & a smear on the
doorstep—
You might wash your hands all morning, but they'll never be clean
again.
In each of these instances selected from my research
portfolio, I try to draw some relational understanding out across a
sparse array of essential evidence. I try to show how worlds that are
usually riddled with concealment and absence can get provisionally and
provocatively highlighted and integrated so that, in a flash of
connective apprehension, people engaging with the work might know more
fully the forces and flows that truly prevail in whatever reality the
extracts come from. The details have the impress of the originating
reality; and for all their fictional ‘panache', the artworks that get
brewed from the details still display a staunch allegiance to something
real.
Restlessness is a crucial factor in these artistic
investigations. By restlessness, I mean the way the artwork—be it a
book, a database, a building, a garden—can activate your imagination by
offering to your mind a system of artful imbalances and implied
possibilities that are available for patterned completion within your
own imagination with reference to what you already believe to be tested
and true in reality. Supreme examples of this aesthetic of generative
incompleteness can be found in Zen temples and gardens, where the
visitor experiences environments that seem ‘charged' with a powerful
integrating ‘urge', a flowing potentiality for overcoming incompletion.
The urge presses in response to something that is implied rather than
shown. To be precise, the urge arises in the visitor; not in the
environment. The visitor often feels compelled to imagine a pattern
cohering across and between the essential elements and the artful
absences that have been offered or extracted for appreciation. Even
though the larger pattern is not explicitly present in the deliberately
‘unresolved' space, it is available because the abstemious offering of
extracts prompts the viewer's urge to complete the inherent pattern.
This urge often helps the viewer feel inseparable from the environment,
to feel responsible for and attuned to some flowing integrity in the
domain under consideration.2
In Zen treatises this connective drive is often called ma
(see Nitschke 117). Applied to contemporary Western
experience it might be dubbed the forensic impulse. This
compulsion to bring previously occluded factors into the public view of
the forum (hence the adjective ‘forensic') seems to be
ubiquitous now in popular culture. Much verbiage could be spent arguing
how distrust of the illusory surfaces skinning contemporary political
and commercial systems has strengthened a vernacular desire to see
behind the scenes, and to draw covert nuances out from concealment.
Clearly this crisis in governmentality accompanies the emergence of
online and interactive communication networks which allow citizens to
seek out and ‘triangulate' their knowledge and to coordinate their
agitprop campaigns (think of getup.org.au and their effect on the
Kevin07 electoral push) instead of passively receiving information in
one uninterrupted flow of opinion. In such a restless world,
never-ending scepticism gets aligned to continuous, rigorous
postulation. It is a creative rather than a cynical impulse. Moreover,
in schools and universities there is a shift away from the expectation
that citizens are merely receptive, and it coincides with a general
abandonment of didactic modes of teaching, to be replaced by the
heuristic or discovery-based mode that encourages students into guided
learning that is stimulated by curiosity and by the careful priming of
essential clues prompting students into further inquiry. (In powerpoint
shorthand, this shift is usually glossed as ‘The Sage on the Stage
gives way to The Guide Alongside'.) Scholars and citizens are
encouraged to become detectives seeking out an ever-expanding array of
hammers for their minds. Attuned to this heuristic mentality, many
artists are drawn similarly to resonant details, to essences and
extracts that are designed to enhance active and sceptical speculation
about the ever-building world.
Having pondered and practised this ‘aesthetic of the
detail' for a couple of decades now, I've begun to understand how to
weld some of my late-acquired insights about the haiku onto yet another
strand of criticism that I encountered at Graduate School, namely the
realist analyses of the great Hungarian critic György
Lukács. Whereas I once would have expected these two approaches
to cancel each other out, I can appreciate the poetry in
Lukács's Marxism more readily now, just as I can see the sly
politics in the Japanese aesthetics.
In Lukács' bravura essay ‘Narrate or Describe',
he sets out a distinction between naturalism (which he finds alluring
but diverting and suspect) and realism (which he admires and endorses
because of its active and revelatory qualities). Lukács
conscripts the work of Zola and Tolstoy to illustrate his polemic. Zola
exemplifies an alienating style of naturalism because he is somewhat
too adroit at petit-pointing details in a process whereby intricate
scenes get ‘described from the standpoint of an observer'. By
contrast, Tolstoy purveys a vital and stimulating realism because he
always hacks out the definitive aspects and grabs the key vectors
inside dynamically evolving scenes that are ‘narrated from
the standpoint of a participant' (Lukács 111). This selective
and active realism causes a kind of Zen satori, an
awakening blow to the mind of the reader. I like to think of it this
way: naturalism is additive and diffuses focus as more and
more details are supplied, which means that realism is bolder and more
useful than naturalism because realism is extractive in the
way it draws out the definitive, structuring elements of a scene.
Whereas naturalist art casts gentle light on surfaces concealing a
deeper reality, realist art helps us probe into the reasons and feel
the shaping forces subtending reality.
Here is the connection back to the haiku and to the
examples from my own research, cited earlier in this essay. In the
Lukácsian mode of realism, because it is extractive, artists are
determined to shuck away extraneous detail so they can learn how the relationships
between
essential elements all cohere contingently to make the
overall, dynamic experience that is everyday existence. The artist and
the audience engage in a forensic process, seeking out and extracting
the key elements or clues that will lead to fuller, more causal
understanding of the scenes being represented.
Rather than risking too much subjectivity by propounding
more examples from my own portfolio, let's exemplify this practice of
extractive realism more exactly by examining an artform that might at
first seem misplaced here: Jamaican dub music. For me, alongside the
centuries-old tradition of the haiku, dub is the other great example of
essence-aesthetics, even though the artform is barely four decades old.
One of the finest practitioners was Osbourne Ruddock, a.k.a. King Tubby
(1941–1989). Tubby produced thousands of remarkable tracks. A brief
soundscape called ‘Version Dub' is one masterpiece among many. It is
worth describing and analysing closely, to show how Lukács's
literary insights might be ported over to help with realist
appreciations of other media.
In less than three minutes, ‘Version Dub' builds a
world, sets a stage, and on that stage Tubby arrays a set of powerful
feelings and conducts a subtle argument about history and art and the
place of subjects (be they vociferous, be they voiceless) within the
legacy of colonialism and slavery. The tune commences with a quiet
cymbal stutter that sounds like wind agitating seedy gourds hanging off
jungle vines. This dry rattle lasts exactly one second before it gets
settled by electric guitar that is highly reverberant, almost pedal
steel, but more peppy with jazz tonics that stretch singing over a
sonic bed of crackly distortion pushing up through the top registers.
This crackle is no accident or problem in the mix. It is meant to be
there. It might be the inserted sound of a stylus grooving on degraded
vinyl or it might be grain in the ferrous oxide of magnetic tape that
has been deliberately dubbed and over-dubbed and amplified a dozen
times or more until the producer has heard and logged the ‘trouble' he
has in mind. There is wow and flutter in there too, purposefully
included. As soon as we have understood all this, we get a few beats
more of the grit, and then we hear some drawly, massed brass
instruments blowing underneath the guitar, pushing between the plucked
strings and the crackle. And now a bassline settles in—solid, dry, no
reverb in this last burr of the sound.
Thus with the tune only twenty seconds old, Tubby has
already sketched out a space for us: the reverb accords dimensions to a
sonic world with audible boundaries, the crackle puts a dirty ground
under our feet, the bass gives a dependable schedule and encourages
trust that this ground will hold while, now and then, the cymbals will
agitate and the horns will blow a flitting breeze that measures the
atmospheric pressure. This world is an aural island of some kind, with
edges, resonance, humidity and a localised sense of time and tone.
But is the island populated? Yes! There it is at the
30-second mark: a little falsetto vocal gulp. An emotional utterance
rather than a semantic statement, this gulp anticipates Michael
Jackson's yelps in ‘Billie Jean' but it also harks way back to African
singing techniques as well as Caribbean church music and early American
R&B crooners like Sonny Til from the Orioles.3 Clearly, the human voice has a place
in Tubby's world. Into his ever thickening soundscape, he has dropped
this startling ululation by Yabby You, a vocalist renowned for silky
melodies that smuggle politically and spiritually ‘conscious' messages
across to the local ‘sufferahs'. Constrained and intensified, the sound
might be anguish or it might be rapture. Of course, in Tubby's world it
is both, it is complementary as well as contradictory.
Then, as if in response to Yabby's call, we get a barely
audible and deliberately thin and degraded skerrick of choral
singing—perhaps it is an ensemble of singers, or perhaps it is one
voice re-copied severally upon itself to form a slightly out-phased
harmonic. This sound is not words you can decipher; rather it is a
vocalised, aestheticised echo that has been conjured and shaped in
response to the first voice. These ‘answering' voices are a long way
back in the mix, as if coming from across a river, off in a yonder
valley, or drifting over the sea from out past the horizon. The distant
call wafts a couple more times and then Tubby pulls all the environing
sound down almost to zero for a moment so that in this lull he lets the
faraway voices register unchallenged, as if they are carried on a
pushing breeze or in a momentary wave of radio transmission.
Only fifty seconds into the song now, we have an
aesthetic model of Jamaica—not just the geography, ecology and
atmosphere of the island but also its history and ideology. Hearing the
sound from the inside, from the standpoint of a participant and an
inhabitant, we experience an extracted model of this place where
absence is a defining feature, where influences drift in partially and
perennially over the horizon, where radio programs come and go from
Florida, Cuba and coast of Texas. We can sense how, in this place of
traces, the ancient indigenes have long been obliterated and the
contemporary inhabitants are migrants always searching for orientation,
always harking back in memory to some elsewhere in their heads even as
they know that this place here is their lot now, that they
have no other home to make but here. With the aesthetics of seepage and
submergence that define dub music, we hear and feel the silence, exile
and cunning that often define a migrant's life.
One and a half minutes into the song, the ‘sound
weather' that Tubby has been conjuring finds its full, stealthy shape.
And straight away the song begins to form its finish. The distant
voices are quickly engulfed again by the drums and horns, louder than
ever, making a swell of larger elements momentarily washing over the
human presence in this world of restless sound. Bringing the tune home
now, Tubby waits for the symphonics to lull once more, wavelike, before
cuing the humanity one last time. The voice resurfaces nearby and the
guitar, horns and drums slowly ebb with the diminishing vocals till the
entire composition goes down to a kind of sunsetting silence thickening
all around the listener.
What strengthens, as the song wanes, is the notion that
‘Version Dub' is a sonic island, closely and sensually modeled on an
actual island. The tune is realist, therefore. From the reverb we can
estimate the scope of the world. From the crackle we get a haptic sense
of how that world might grip. From the emerging and submerging
insinuations of the different melodies, we sense the dynamics flushing
through this domain made of sound. It's as if we're left hearing, from
the inside, an exquisite abstraction of the geography and fecundity of
Tubby's kingdom. Which is both a fantastic and a real place.
To the extent that the song refers to the drift and
decay of radio transmissions emanating from Florida and Cuba, it is a
quick lesson in international relations. There's that word again:
relations. It links us back to the haikus with which we commenced this
essay. And it helps us bring the essay to a close. The poetry of Seishi
and Gray and the music of Tubby all extract intensified reality through
the same process: instantaneous, immersed perception gets interwoven
with volatile, voluptuous remembrance, altogether releasing that
now-familiar flood of associations. Like a condensed guide to a
globalising existence, Tubby's tune offers a sensory commentary on the
memory-waste, the associative rumination and the institutional
thought-policing that abrade any migrant's attempt to find a home or a
voice in any place, new or old, where one might need to establish an
identity founded not on origins but on ingenuity and persistence.
Displacement, persistence, ingenuity, changefulness; these real
elements have been rendered into art that can orient you. ‘Version Dub'
is a plangent thesis explaining how the modern consciousness is
inevitably a variable work in progress, something that has to be
asserted and endlessly earned and performed moment by moment in
negotiation with prevailing conditions. Not ‘grounded' in a homeland,
the modern consciousness cannot rely on myths that celebrate how people
can arise from their original, hosting soil; instead the
modern citizen tends to arrive and survive in a
place where no birthright is readymade. Hence the defining and
completely pertinent sense of erasure and incompletion in dub, the
sense of a musical form in which utterance competes with voicelessness,
where agency contends with anonymity. And hence the ‘x-ray' quality of
this music, the way it is built from extracts and underlying hints that
grant the listener a clearer apprehension of the tangled contemporary
world' (Veal 196).4
Tubby's compositions are forensic and Lukácsian
therefore, in the way they extract and emphasise the previously covert
principles that organise the real place that he represents. Having made
this link, we can bring the essay full-circle to its close now by
noting how Tubby's music is useful and inspiring in a way that matches
Seishi's and Gray's poems: all these artworks are poetically forensic
and extractively realist; they inkle out the resonant details and the
immaterial relations that really matter, that galvanise a scene and
keep the artist and the audience allied to reality. In this tense but
thrilling interplay between the urge to select and the urge to combine,
the artist can make sure that a provocative, contentious, continuous
and pinpoint-efficient realism is always playing out.
In a globalised, saturated world of networked glut,
realism like this can be a beacon. In its brevity and speculative
association, this extractive but active realism helps us find some way
to maintain our allegiance to the world of everyday experience. As
another of Gray's miniature poems says:
The world, it seems, is the maximum
Number of things, or of forces,
That can exist together.
(Gray, ‘Epigrams')
To know this world properly we need art that lets us
comprehend just as many extracted things and forces as can relate well
together. Realistically, we need to be in the midst of only what's
essential. No more details than that.
|